Re: Integers on 64-bit machines

Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:32:04 +0000 (UTC)

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2007-07-05)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-07-06)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-08)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2007-07-08)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines torbenm@app-6.diku.dk (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-07-09)
Re: Integers on 64-bit machines marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2007-07-10)
[7 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 08:32:04 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
References: 07-07-007 07-07-021 07-07-025
Keywords: architecture

On 2007-07-06, Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl> wrote:
> [Jeez, I thought we got away from the abomination of pointers that are
> longer than ints when we left the 286 large mode. No such luck, huh? -John]


Afaik even Linux-on-Alpha had already 32-bit ints? It's not such a surprise
that x86_64 follows that.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.