Related articles |
---|
Strong Types ? hossein.rohani@gmail.com (gygulance) (2007-04-26) |
Re: Strong Types ? torbenm@app-6.diku.dk (2007-04-27) |
Re: Strong Types ? scgupta@yahoo.com (Satish Chandra Gupta) (2007-04-27) |
Re: Strong Types ? oliverhunt@gmail.com (oliverhunt@gmail.com) (2007-04-28) |
Staic typechecking in OO [was Re: Strong Types ?] Sebastian.Kaliszewski@softax.pl (Sebastian Kaliszewski) (2007-05-04) |
Re: Static typechecking in OO [was Re: Strong Types ?] oliverhunt@gmail.com (oliverhunt@gmail.com) (2007-05-06) |
Re: Static typechecking in OO [was Re: Strong Types ?] Sebastian.Kaliszewski@softax.pl (Sebastian Kaliszewski) (2007-05-14) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | gygulance <hossein.rohani@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Apr 2007 09:45:04 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | types, question |
Posted-Date: | 26 Apr 2007 09:45:04 EDT |
I faced a question during my research on desing and implementation of
programming language. The question arises from area of type binding
and checking in design of programming languages. question :
Can we call a programming language which has both static type
checking and static type binding a strongly type programming
language; if so why and is there any programming language with these
characteristics.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.