Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed

Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
14 Apr 2007 20:41:31 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[5 earlier articles]
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed ian.rogers@manchester.ac.uk (Ian Rogers) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed meissner@the-meissners.org (Michael Meissner) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed georgeps@xmission.com (George Peter Staplin) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed tmk@netvision.net.il (Michael Tiomkin) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-14)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-14)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-04-18)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-23)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-23)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-04-25)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-26)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 14 Apr 2007 20:41:31 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-04-031 07-04-045
Keywords: architecture, performance

George Peter Staplin wrote:


> Note: the modern CPUs use some form of SRAM for the high
> speed caches builtin to the CPU.


Note2: A cache holds frequently used data. In so far it were not a
special problem, when the cache loses data which are not used for a
long time. It were sufficient to detect a cache miss, before an access
to vanished data could occur.


Kind of LRU algorithm, implemented in hardware? ;-)


DoDi



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.