Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
13 Apr 2007 12:48:57 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[3 earlier articles]
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed ian.rogers@manchester.ac.uk (Ian Rogers) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed meissner@the-meissners.org (Michael Meissner) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed georgeps@xmission.com (George Peter Staplin) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed tmk@netvision.net.il (Michael Tiomkin) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk (2007-04-13)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-14)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-04-14)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2007-04-18)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-23)
Re: 32-bit vs. 64-bit x86 Speed haberg@math.su.se (2007-04-23)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 13 Apr 2007 12:48:57 -0400
Organization: dotat labs
References: 07-04-031 07-04-045
Keywords: C, errors
Posted-Date: 13 Apr 2007 12:48:57 EDT

George Peter Staplin <georgeps@xmission.com> wrote:
>
>The 2038 bug generally is fixed by a 64-bit computer.


Not entirely. There are many external data layouts that use 32 bit time_t
in some form, most prominently filesystems.


Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.