Related articles |
---|
[4 earlier articles] |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? roar.foshaug@systor.st (Roar) (2007-01-17) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2007-01-20) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Ibeam2000@gmail.com (Nick) (2007-01-28) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bvanevery@gmail.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? stevem@ans.com.au (Steve Murray) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bmoses-nospam@cits1.stanford.edu (Brooks Moses) (2007-02-16) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? codeplay@gmail.com (2007-02-25) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? idbaxter@semdesigns.com (Ira Baxter) (2007-03-01) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? mmoudgill@sandbridgetech.com (Mayan Moudgill) (2007-03-17) |
From: | Tom Copeland <tom@infoether.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 31 Jan 2007 12:53:53 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 07-01-04307-01-051 07-01-072 |
Keywords: | interpreter, code |
Posted-Date: | 31 Jan 2007 12:53:53 EST |
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 01:41 -0500, Nick wrote:
> Except maybe where there is lots to be gained by more performant and
> non-conformant application software, there is reduced incentive to
> accept or develop anything like a new language,
Hm, from where I sit, the Ruby language is relatively new and is coming
on strong. Also, it's introducing lots of people to all sorts of nifty
things that have been around for a long time, e.g., closures.
> let alone compile it.
One of the more recent Ruby developments is YARV, which compiles Ruby to
a bytecode format. All the usual compiler theory things apply, even if
the target is a VM rather than a "real machine".
So perhaps all hope is not yet lost :-)
Yours,
Tom
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.