Re: The development tendency of compilation tech?

Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com>
31 Jan 2007 12:51:24 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
The development tendency of compilation tech? yunzhi@intec.iscas.ac.cn (Yunzhi Xue) (2007-01-15)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2007-01-15)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2007-01-15)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2007-01-16)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? roar.foshaug@systor.st (Roar) (2007-01-17)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2007-01-20)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Ibeam2000@gmail.com (Nick) (2007-01-28)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2007-01-31)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bvanevery@gmail.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2007-01-31)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? stevem@ans.com.au (Steve Murray) (2007-01-31)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2007-01-31)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-01-31)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bmoses-nospam@cits1.stanford.edu (Brooks Moses) (2007-02-16)
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? codeplay@gmail.com (2007-02-25)
[2 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Jan 2007 12:51:24 -0500
Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com
References: 07-01-04307-01-051 07-01-072
Keywords: code, interpreter
Posted-Date: 31 Jan 2007 12:51:24 EST

Nick wrote:
>>One tendency that has come during the last ten years, is that of
>>compiling to byte code for virtual machines.
>
>>Another trend, not in compilers as such, but related, is the tendency,
>>due to ever faster machines, to write larger and larger programs in
>>interpreted code.
>
> What's new in compilers? Very little. I think in 10 years, compiling
> will be largely forgotten.


Hard to get along without it, eh? At some point you're still going to
need a compiler. Bytecode-type languages are still compilers, written
for a specific (virtual machine) architecture, which could be
implemented in hardware, software, microcode, or any combination. In
any case, you still have to compile the interpreter somehow.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.