Related articles |
---|
The development tendency of compilation tech? yunzhi@intec.iscas.ac.cn (Yunzhi Xue) (2007-01-15) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? derek@knosof.co.uk (Derek M. Jones) (2007-01-15) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2007-01-15) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2007-01-16) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? roar.foshaug@systor.st (Roar) (2007-01-17) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2007-01-20) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Ibeam2000@gmail.com (Nick) (2007-01-28) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bvanevery@gmail.com (Brandon J. Van Every) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? stevem@ans.com.au (Steve Murray) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2007-01-31) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? bmoses-nospam@cits1.stanford.edu (Brooks Moses) (2007-02-16) |
Re: The development tendency of compilation tech? codeplay@gmail.com (2007-02-25) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 31 Jan 2007 12:51:24 -0500 |
Organization: | Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com |
References: | 07-01-04307-01-051 07-01-072 |
Keywords: | code, interpreter |
Posted-Date: | 31 Jan 2007 12:51:24 EST |
Nick wrote:
>>One tendency that has come during the last ten years, is that of
>>compiling to byte code for virtual machines.
>
>>Another trend, not in compilers as such, but related, is the tendency,
>>due to ever faster machines, to write larger and larger programs in
>>interpreted code.
>
> What's new in compilers? Very little. I think in 10 years, compiling
> will be largely forgotten.
Hard to get along without it, eh? At some point you're still going to
need a compiler. Bytecode-type languages are still compilers, written
for a specific (virtual machine) architecture, which could be
implemented in hardware, software, microcode, or any combination. In
any case, you still have to compile the interpreter somehow.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.