Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF

"Daniel C. Wang" <danwang74@gmail.com>
9 Jan 2007 13:29:45 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Using functional notation to extend BNF zzq@hvc.rr.com (Bill Fenlason) (2007-01-08)
Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2007-01-09)
Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF roar.foshaug@systor.st (Roar) (2007-01-09)
Re: Using functional notation to extend BNF RLake@Oxfam.org.uk (2007-01-15)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "Daniel C. Wang" <danwang74@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 9 Jan 2007 13:29:45 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 07-01-025
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 09 Jan 2007 13:29:45 EST

Bill Fenlason wrote:
{stuff deleted}
> Interesting, or just old news?


What you've describe seems like a form of vW-grammar.


http://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/vw.html


General vW-grammars are context sensitive if I'm not mistaken.
vW-grammar's were used to define the semantics of Algol-68.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.