Re: IL design?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?= <Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de>
11 Dec 2006 18:15:08 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
IL design? compilerguru@gmail.com (2006-12-11)
Re: IL design? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-12-11)
Re: IL design? bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2006-12-12)
Re: IL design? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-12-13)
Re: IL design? bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2006-12-14)
Re: IL design? rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2006-12-14)
Re: IL design? robert.hundt@gmail.com (Robert H) (2006-12-21)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?= <Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 11 Dec 2006 18:15:08 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-12-049
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 11 Dec 2006 18:15:08 EST

compilerguru@gmail.com wrote:


> I would like know what people think is the best Intermediate
> language(IL) to be used for code generation having:
> a) highly effective optimizations


C


> b)portability . .


C


Not joking. C is a portable macro assembly language.
[It's challenging to retain high level info, though. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.