Re: finding all dominator trees

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
6 Dec 2006 08:58:06 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[9 earlier articles]
Re: finding all dominator trees cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-11-30)
Re: finding all dominator trees amichail@gmail.com (Amir Michail) (2006-12-03)
Re: finding all dominator trees diablovision@yahoo.com (2006-12-04)
Re: finding all dominator trees amichail@gmail.com (Amir Michail) (2006-12-05)
Re: finding all dominator trees cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-12-05)
Re: finding all dominator trees martin@gkc.org.uk (Martin Ward) (2006-12-05)
Re: finding all dominator trees mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-12-06)
Re: finding all dominator trees cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-12-06)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 6 Dec 2006 08:58:06 -0500
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 06-11-09606-11-131 06-12-025 06-12-033 06-12-036
Keywords: analysis

On 5 Dec 2006 06:19:39 -0500, Amir Michail wrote:


> My problem is well defined as discussed above, although it's a bit
> different from what people normally do in compilers.


Well, actually if the language being compiled allowed ad-hoc supertypes,
then the resulting inheritance tree might look exactly as you described. B
and C were subtypes of each other.


--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.