Re: Translating OO program to procedural program

I can recommend you to read this paper :
http://www.planetpdf.com/developer/article.asp?ContentID=6635
html:
http://209.85.129.104/search?q=cache:ijA3UAXtXcUJ:www.planetpdf.com/developer
/article.asp%3FContentID%3D6635+Object-oriented+programming+is+the+current+cu
re-all&hl=ru&ct=clnk&cd=1&client=firefox-a


regards


Norayr Chilingaryan


---
http://geocities.com/n0rayr




"moop™ писал(а):
"
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project translates OO programs to procedural
> programs, such as translating C++ to C and the like. I hope this
> effort can be spreaded out to other langs, so I am working on to
> abstract the common issues of doing so. I know there is a pinoneer
> attempt is C Front which produce C++ programs via a C compiler, I want
> to have a look on that, but still cannot find it now, anyone can
> suggest this to me?
>
> My approach is just to rename the methods with the instance name so
> that they can be placed in a single source file and then be compiled
> later by the procedural lang compiler. For instance,
>
> class A{
> B b;
> void method(){
> b.run();
> }
> }
>
> class B{
> void run(){
> ...
> }
> }
>
> If the main rountine is
> void main(){
> A a = new A();
> a.method();
> }
>
> then the program would be translated to
> void a_method(){
> a_b_run();
> }
>
> void a_b_run(){
> ...
> }
> But I feel it is really not an adaptable way when dealing with
> declaration inside iterations whose number of iteration is not sure,
> means that we cannot change the names of the reference inside the
> iteration.
> for(...){
> A a = new A();
> }
> So far I am a little bit frustrated on this approach, anyone has
> better idea? Pls share your thoughts, thank you!

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.