Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-21) |
Re: HLL design mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-10-21) |
Re: HLL design int2k@gmx.net (Wolfram Fenske) (2006-10-21) |
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-21) |
Re: HLL design free4trample@yahoo.com (fermineutron) (2006-10-21) |
Re: HLL design danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2006-10-24) |
Re: HLL design idknow@gmail.com (idknow@gmail.com) (2006-10-24) |
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-24) |
Re: HLL design amedlock@gmail.com (DavidM) (2006-10-24) |
Re: HLL design DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-10-26) |
Re: HLL design bjarke.walling@gmail.com (Bjarke Walling) (2006-10-28) |
From: | "idknow@gmail.com" <idknow@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 24 Oct 2006 17:34:08 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-10-08006-10-089 |
Keywords: | design, performance |
Posted-Date: | 24 Oct 2006 17:34:08 EDT |
fermineutron wrote:
> Thank you everyone that replied. It will probaby take me a while to
> process everything that has bess posted so far. Ill post again soon.
>
> Another question is this:
>
> If I do decide to write the new language, do you think that writing a
> compiler into asm be the better bet or will translating variables into
> C structures and handling everything on the level of C language be
> good enough? Natureally then there would be a need do use a C compiler
> to actually produce the exe file.
> [Depends on whether your data structures are ones that C can
> represent. If one stack and no garbage collection are adequate, C
> should work fine. -John]
Fermineutron, greetings.
I'd suggest that you follow the common maxim and optimise the 10% of
the code that is run 90% of the time
instead of just willy-nilly(TM, technical term) optimising.
enjoy, keep us posted!
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.