Related articles |
---|
New compiler and language justncase80@gmail.com (2006-09-28) |
Re: New compiler and language justncase80@gmail.com (justncase80) (2006-10-03) |
Re: New compiler and language aj@andrew.cmu.edu (Arthur J. O'Dwyer) (2006-10-04) |
Re: New compiler and language yakumo9275@gmail.com (stu) (2006-10-04) |
From: | "stu" <yakumo9275@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 4 Oct 2006 11:48:32 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-09-14806-10-009 06-10-015 |
Keywords: | design |
Posted-Date: | 04 Oct 2006 11:48:32 EDT |
Arthur J. O'Dwyer wrote:
> Okay, now my only real on-topic comment: Justn, what's your
> "language" supposed to /do/, exactly? I looked at the examples, and
> what I saw was:
Sounds to me like a bad 'case tool'. Oracle tried to sell us a bunch
of this stuff a very long time ago (v6 timeframe). Garbage that would
'build the entire application' based just on your db schema.
This 'entity programming' language sounds just like those case tools,
maybe he needs to study more up on uml and its code generation...
-stu
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.