Re: Compile to C difficulties

russell kym horsell <kym@ukato.freeshell.org>
18 Sep 2006 09:46:49 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Compile to C difficulties chpowell2002@yahoo.com (Charlie) (2006-09-08)
Re: Compile to C difficulties tmk@netvision.net.il (Michael Tiomkin) (2006-09-08)
Re: Compile to C difficulties pjb@informatimago.com (Pascal Bourguignon) (2006-09-08)
Re: Compile to C difficulties gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2006-09-09)
Re: Compile to C difficulties chpowell2002@yahoo.com (Charlie) (2006-09-11)
Re: Compile to C difficulties gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2006-09-12)
Re: Compile to C difficulties chpowell2002@yahoo.com (Charlie) (2006-09-16)
Re: Compile to C difficulties kym@ukato.freeshell.org (russell kym horsell) (2006-09-18)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: russell kym horsell <kym@ukato.freeshell.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 18 Sep 2006 09:46:49 -0400
Organization: Central Iowa (Model) Railroad, Plano, TX, USA
References: 06-09-026 06-09-031
Keywords: C

George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> wrote:
} On 8 Sep 2006 16:56:43 -0400, "Charlie" <chpowell2002@yahoo.com>
} wrote:


} >Jenny/Jenagin is implimented with a version of Gentle, which
} >compiles to C in a simplistic fashion. Since many of the rules
} >are recursive, the C procedure stack can overflow ...
} >Currently I am working on improved translation to C.
} Stack limits on most systems are pretty liberal (see below) so if the
} stack is routinely overflowing, I would work seriously on eliminating
} recursion in the generated code.
[...]




Some people are lucky. Some people get 64 KB due to O/S design. :)



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.