Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort

Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com>
16 Sep 2006 15:54:48 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-09-12)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort bonzini@gnu.org (Paolo Bonzini) (2006-09-12)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2006-09-12)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort news@tom.iecc.com (2006-09-12)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort wclodius@lanl.gov (2006-09-12)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort cbarron413@adelphia.net (Carl Barron) (2006-09-13)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2006-09-16)
Re: Pascal vs. linkers, was The History of the ALGOL Effort Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-09-16)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 Sep 2006 15:54:48 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-08-082 06-08-086 06-08-105 06-08-138 06-09-050 06-09-051 06-09-057 06-09-066
Keywords: Pascal, history
Posted-Date: 16 Sep 2006 15:54:48 EDT

Separate compilation and the development process of segmenting
a problem into separate pieces are separate issues. C and most
main stream languages easily allow a primary file to include multiple
components to the application. In the same manner libraries can be
created and used as necessary in most current languages.


w..


Peter Flass wrote:


> A large program is not particularly convienent, and separate compilation
> lets you edit the program a logical piece at a time.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.