Related articles |
---|
Re: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-29) |
Re: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-07-29) |
Re: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-31) |
RE: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi qtj-query@shaw.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2006-07-31) |
Re: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-08-03) |
RE: yacc for Pascal, was Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursi qtj-query@shaw.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2006-08-06) |
From: | Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Aug 2006 11:02:17 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 06-07-111 06-07-113 |
Keywords: | parse, C++ |
Posted-Date: | 03 Aug 2006 11:02:17 EDT |
Quinn Tyler Jackson schrieb:
> DoDi:
>> I've participated in the beta test of Meta-S, and this may have
>> influenced my opinion about useful parser generators. It's really a
>> great tool, with only few limitations :-)
> I consider a grammar
> broken (until proven otherwise) the moment it *must* call code in a
> reduction to know whether or not it should accept something as legal.
I'm just curious: could you make the C++ grammar work, so that it works
without an external disambiguation between typenames and other identifiers?
DoDi
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.