Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion?

Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com>
28 Jul 2006 18:43:40 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[17 earlier articles]
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? ajonospam@andrew.cmu.edu (Arthur J. O'Dwyer) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? find@my.address.elsewhere (Matthias Blume) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-28)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-07-29)
[7 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Chris F Clark <cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Jul 2006 18:43:40 -0400
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
References: 06-07-024 06-07-027 06-07-035 06-07-046 06-07-050 06-07-055 06-07-060
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 28 Jul 2006 18:43:40 EDT

Max Hailperin <max@gustavus.edu> writes:


> You seem to be conceding too much here. The essential difference is
> in the parsers, not just the parser generators. Recall (as I
> explained in http://compilers.iecc.com/comparch/article/06-04-136 )
> that an LR parser is a shift/reduce parser whereas an LL parser is a
> confirm/expand parser.
...


Point well-taken and well-made. Moreover, anyone who wants to
understand LL and LR parsing would be well advised to read Max's
article that he has kindly pointed us to. To my mind, it was a clear
and lucid explanation of the principles behind how the parsing
algorithms work that can help one have an informed intuition.


<In fact, John, if it isn't referenced in the FAQ, I would recomend
adding a pointer to it in the FAQ.>


-Chris


*****************************************************************************
Chris Clark Internet : compres@world.std.com
Compiler Resources, Inc. Web Site : http://world.std.com/~compres
23 Bailey Rd voice : (508) 435-5016
Berlin, MA 01503 USA fax : (978) 838-0263 (24 hours)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.