Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion?

Carl Barron <cbarron413@adelphia.net>
24 Jul 2006 13:23:10 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[8 earlier articles]
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-07-21)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-22)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2006-07-22)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? egagnon@sablevm.org (Etienne Gagnon) (2006-07-22)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-07-23)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? max@gustavus.edu (Max Hailperin) (2006-07-23)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? cbarron413@adelphia.net (Carl Barron) (2006-07-24)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? DrDiettrich1@aol.com (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? ajonospam@andrew.cmu.edu (Arthur J. O'Dwyer) (2006-07-25)
Re: Why LL(1) Parsers do not support left recursion? wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2006-07-28)
[16 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Carl Barron <cbarron413@adelphia.net>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Jul 2006 13:23:10 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-07-059 06-07-065
Keywords: parse
Posted-Date: 24 Jul 2006 13:23:10 EDT

SM Ryan <wyrmwif@tsoft.org> wrote:


> # 3. Only LL(1) recursive descent parsers are readable, that's why no
> # LL(k) parser generators exist, in contrast to LR(k) parser generators.


      What about ANTLR, or spirit in boost.?? Both generate parsers
ANTLR in the classical sense that it generates code to be compiled
like yacc/bison does, and spirit is an embedded template based parser
generator that lets the C++ compiler itself generate the grammar from
the EBNF. There are other LL(k) for fixed k parser generators as
well, but these are the ones I have some familiarity with.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.