Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ??

Gene Wirchenko <gene@abhost.us>
27 Jun 2006 18:58:13 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[6 earlier articles]
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-06-05)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? p_ludemann@yahoo.com (Peter Ludemann) (2006-06-11)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? jthorn@aei.mpg.de (Jonathan Thornburg) (2006-06-12)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? haberg@math.su.se (2006-06-12)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-06-15)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? gene@abhost.us (Gene Wirchenko) (2006-06-27)
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? gene@abhost.us (Gene Wirchenko) (2006-06-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Gene Wirchenko <gene@abhost.us>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Jun 2006 18:58:13 -0400
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 06-05-083
Keywords: design
Posted-Date: 27 Jun 2006 18:58:13 EDT

olivier.chatelain@gmail.com wrote:


>What about using Plural => Singular transformations to generate loop
>variables from name of lists?


          The transformation is not well-defined. For example, the
singular of "axes" is either "axis" or "axe" (or "ax").


[snip]


Sincerely,


Gene Wirchenko

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.