Related articles |
---|
What is the future of Compiler ? blertadn@yahoo.com (blerta bishaj) (2006-06-12) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? tommy.thorn@gmail.com (Tommy Thorn) (2006-06-19) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) (2006-06-20) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? tommy.thorn@gmail.com (Tommy Thorn) (2006-07-05) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? torbenm@app-4.diku.dk (2006-07-06) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? oliver@zeigermann.de (Oliver Zeigermann) (2006-07-16) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? Juergen.Kahrs@vr-web.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_Kahrs?=) (2006-07-16) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-07-19) |
Re: What is the future of Compiler technology? Colin_Paul_Gloster@ACM.org (Colin Paul Gloster) (2006-07-19) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | Oliver Bandel <oliver@first.in-berlin.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 20 Jun 2006 00:47:13 -0400 |
Organization: | Individual Network Berlin e.V. |
References: | 06-06-044 06-06-055 |
Keywords: | parse, history |
Posted-Date: | 20 Jun 2006 00:47:12 EDT |
Tommy Thorn wrote:
> Blerta, you seem to equate compilers with parsing. It is true that
> parsing was the first challenge as compilers started to come into
> existance (roughly 1950-60), but today parsing is a very well
> understood problem (and IMO not the interesting problem anymore).
[...]
Depends on what you want to parse/generate.
There are some newer things around, where real language
analysis/synthesis is in use.
IMHO there are some things that are newer than the stuff from the
60ties.
Generating documents, that on the first look may look like a
scientific paper needs more compiler knowledge than only analysing the
stuff from some decades ago.
Ciao,
Oliver
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.