Related articles |
---|
Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? olivier.chatelain@gmail.com (2006-05-26) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? owong@castortech.com (Oliver Wong) (2006-05-30) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? dmaziuk@bmrb.wisc.edu (Dimitri Maziuk) (2006-05-30) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-05-30) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? tom@infoether.com (Tom Copeland) (2006-05-30) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? 148f3wg02@sneakemail.com (Karsten Nyblad) (2006-06-03) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-06-05) |
Re: Natural "for" Loop, using Plural / Singular transformations ?? p_ludemann@yahoo.com (Peter Ludemann) (2006-06-11) |
[5 later articles] |
From: | "Oliver Wong" <owong@castortech.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 30 May 2006 18:37:45 -0400 |
Organization: | GlobeTrotter |
References: | 06-05-083 |
Keywords: | syntax |
Posted-Date: | 30 May 2006 18:37:45 EDT |
<olivier.chatelain@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> FOR dependency IN dependencies DO
> PRINT dependency.name
> END
>
> = depenendcies -generates-> dependency =
>
> FORALL dependencies DO
> PRINT dependency.name
> END
>
> The compiler would generate the "singular" loop variable "dependency"
> from the List "dependencies" (Plural).
>
> This would reduce the code size, improve those long, unreadable headers
> and simply plain-editor refactoring.
>
> Any comments?
> Olivier
>
> [OK, what's the plural of deer or sheep?
[...]
> -John]
Or what's the plural/singular version of names that I just make up?
FORALL RXX9402EjjDD DO
PRINT /*What's the singular of "RXX9402EjjDD"?*/.name
END
- Oliver
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.