Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
23 Apr 2006 14:45:47 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture acampbellb@hotmail.com (Avatar) (2006-04-21)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture brennie@dcsi.net.au (2006-04-22)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2006-04-22)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture brennie@dcsi.net.au (2006-04-23)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2006-04-25)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture vladimir.d.lushnikov@gmail.com (Vladimir Lushnikov) (2006-04-28)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-05-01)
Re: Framed Stack vs. Two Stack Architecture eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2006-05-03)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 23 Apr 2006 14:45:47 -0400
Organization: dotat labs
References: 06-04-126 06-04-130
Keywords: storage
Posted-Date: 23 Apr 2006 14:45:47 EDT

brennie@dcsi.net.au wrote:
>
>Personally, two stack is the better approach as you are keeping the
>evaluation sematics seperate from the control semantics.


On the other hand, if you like continuation-passing style, one stack
seems to make more sense.


Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
HUMBER THAMES: NORTH VEERING EAST OR SOUTHEAST 3 OR 4. RAIN DYING OUT.
MODERATE OR POOR BECOMING GOOD.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.