|Fast NFA engine anyone? email@example.com (Remo D.) (2006-04-21)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? firstname.lastname@example.org (Russ Cox) (2006-04-22)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? email@example.com (Remo D.) (2006-04-22)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-04-23)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? firstname.lastname@example.org (2006-04-23)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? Danny.Dube@ift.ulaval.ca (2006-05-11)|
|Re: Fast NFA engine anyone? email@example.com (Remo D.) (2006-05-12)|
|From:||"Russ Cox" <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||22 Apr 2006 03:10:24 -0400|
> Consider that I would even sacrifice some of the expressiveness of
> regexp. I already dropped the operator | without any impact on the final
Since all your patterns are anchored, it's trivial to figure out where
the DFA entered a matching state, as John pointed out. Also, there
is no need to drop the | operator.
I posted a simple, fast DFA-based regular expression engine at
http://swtch.com/~rsc/dfagrep.tgz. The NFA code is about 1000
lines (includes parsing regular expressions), and the DFA code,
which builds the DFA on-demand while running it, is only about 250 lines.
There is a program filegrep.c that does essentially what you were
asking - read a list of regexps from one file and then match them
against lines from a second.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.