Re: Grammar translator

"rnbrady@gmail.com" <rnbrady@gmail.com>
27 Mar 2006 01:26:58 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Grammar translator rnbrady@gmail.com (rnbrady@gmail.com) (2006-03-11)
Re: Grammar translator bsheff2@yahoo.com (Bob Sheff) (2006-03-16)
Re: Grammar translator rnbrady@gmail.com (rnbrady@gmail.com) (2006-03-27)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "rnbrady@gmail.com" <rnbrady@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 27 Mar 2006 01:26:58 -0500
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 06-03-02806-03-070
Keywords: translator
Posted-Date: 27 Mar 2006 01:26:58 EST

Bob Sheff wrote:
> I thought everyone would use their favorite translator tool as a
> grammar translator as I have. It seems to me, grammars are easier
> than "real" languages, because you needn't worry about semantics,
> variable/structure modes,... and many of the grammars are non-perfect
> anyway. regards, Bob


Bob


Thanks for your reply. I was just wondered if anyone had bothered to
package all the grammars for different compiler-compilers into a single
peice of code. It would be useful and would encourage people to explore
new options. As a newbie getting my old grammar translated to ANTLR
took a while because of the subtleties.


Richard


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.