|Re: Dangling else firstname.lastname@example.org (SM Ryan) (2006-02-24)|
|Re: Dangling else email@example.com (Russ Cox) (2006-02-24)|
|Re: Dangling else firstname.lastname@example.org (2006-03-05)|
|Re: Dangling else email@example.com (Marco van de Voort) (2006-03-11)|
|Re: operator precedence, was Dangling else firstname.lastname@example.org (Paolo Bonzini) (2006-03-14)|
|From:||"Paolo Bonzini" <email@example.com>|
|Date:||14 Mar 2006 00:54:57 -0500|
|References:||06-02-15406-02-168 06-03-008 06-03-023|
> > Pascal tried, and the result was
> > counterintuitive cases where certain parentheses, which everyone agrees
> > ought to be redundant, are in fact necessary.
> Could you give examples here? Are you refering to the experimental
> notations for exponentiation 2^(-1) in some dialects ?
I think he referred to the parentheses in "(a <= b) and (c > d)", which
were mandatory in Pascal.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.