Related articles |
---|
Symbol tables and scopes DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-01-28) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes david@tribble.com (David R Tribble) (2006-02-02) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2006-02-03) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2006-02-03) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes gdr@integrable-solutions.net (Gabriel Dos Reis) (2006-02-06) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-02-06) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-02-06) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2006-02-06) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com (Peter Flass) (2006-02-07) |
Re: Symbol tables and scopes alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2006-02-11) |
[14 later articles] |
From: | Peter Flass <Peter_Flass@Yahoo.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 3 Feb 2006 18:40:17 -0500 |
Organization: | Road Runner |
References: | 06-01-101 |
Keywords: | symbols |
Posted-Date: | 03 Feb 2006 18:40:17 EST |
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
>
> In an IDE instead a tree of scopes must be used, and a symbol must be
> searched in all scopes, from the current (innermost local) scope up to
> the global scope in the root of the tree. Any suggestions on the
> implementation of such a data structure, or should I stay with my
> existing approach, extended by a search through multiple symbol
> tables?
I can't lay any claim to originality, but I use a two-layer structure.
I have one "base" entry for a unque symbol (name). The "base" entry
contains a list of pointers to the actual symbol table entries, one for
each declaration, and the id of the block containing the declaration. I
look up the symbol and then scan the list to find the applicable
declaration for the current scope.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.