Re: Basic blocks and compilers

"FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com" <FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com>
9 Jan 2006 23:49:08 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Basic blocks and compilers plfriko@yahoo.de (Christian Christmann) (2006-01-07)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com (FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers momchil.velikov@gmail.com (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers bonzini@gnu.org (Paolo Bonzini) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers kenrose@tfb.com (Ken Rose) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers stephen.clarke@earthling.net (Stephen Clarke) (2006-01-09)
Re: Basic blocks and compilers lars@bearnip.com (2006-01-09)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com" <FireMeteor.Guo@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 9 Jan 2006 23:49:08 -0500
Organization: http://groups.google.com
References: 06-01-009
Keywords: analysis
Posted-Date: 09 Jan 2006 23:49:08 EST

Do the labels here (such as .L2) have anything to do with the basic
block? I don't think so. Your point about what a block should be is
basicly correct, but just have nothing to do with these labels.
These labels are attached only because some jumps are targeting at
them.


That's my opinion.


G.R.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.