Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control?

RLake@oxfam.org.uk
24 Dec 2005 15:34:24 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? bob_rossi@cox.net (Bob) (2005-12-19)
Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? dickey@saltmine.radix.net (Thomas Dickey) (2005-12-19)
Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-12-19)
Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2005-12-23)
Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? RLake@oxfam.org.uk (2005-12-24)
Re: How to use flex/bison with an inverted flow of control? clint@0lsen.net (Clint Olsen) (2005-12-30)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: RLake@oxfam.org.uk
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 24 Dec 2005 15:34:24 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-12-049 05-12-061
Keywords: yacc
Posted-Date: 24 Dec 2005 15:34:24 EST

DoDi wrote:


> Bob wrote:


>> Instead of bison asking for the tokens, I would like to give it one
>> token at a time, and have it tell me when it's done. That way, I can
>> give it data as it arrives to me. Are there any reliable open source
>> projects out there that work like this?


> You want a "reversed" parser logic, where the input module calls the
> lexer, which in turn calls the parser...?


> An interesting idea, but perhaps a bit away from the main stream
> development.


You might want to look at the LEMON parser generator, which is
designed for precisely that control flow model:


<http://www.hwaci.com/sw/lemon/index.html>


I can't vouch for its reliability, but it's certainly open source (public
domain, in fact).


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.