Re: language design, syntax extension, was Why context-free?

Ivan Boldyrev <boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru>
15 Nov 2005 23:28:01 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-10-06)
Re: Why context-free? gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-10-09)
Re: Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-10-13)
Re: syntax extension, was Why context-free? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2005-11-01)
Re: syntax extension, was Why context-free? nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-11-01)
Re: syntax extension, was Why context-free? toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2005-11-04)
Re: language design, syntax extension, was Why context-free? owong@castortech.com (Oliver Wong) (2005-11-12)
Re: language design, syntax extension, was Why context-free? boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2005-11-15)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Ivan Boldyrev <boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 15 Nov 2005 23:28:01 -0500
Organization: this field is intentionally left blank
References: 05-10-053 05-10-068 05-10-075 05-11-006 05-11-013 05-11-039 05-11-066
Keywords: administrivia

On 9292 day of my life Oliver Wong wrote:
> Out of curiosity, IS there a newsgroup for language design? The best I
> could come up with are comp.lang and alt.comp.lang, both of which only seem
> to contain only spam.


There is ll1 discussion list that might be interesting:
<https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/ll-discuss>.
Though it is a list, not a newsgroups.


--
Ivan Boldyrev


                                                                              XML -- new language of ML family.



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.