Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question

Bill Cox <bill@qswtools.com>
8 Nov 2005 23:34:53 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Cygwin 'byacc' question andreytarasevich@hotmail.com (Andrey Tarasevich) (2005-11-02)
Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question kst-u@mib.org (Keith Thompson) (2005-11-04)
Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question bill@qswtools.com (Bill Cox) (2005-11-08)
Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question toby@telegraphics.com.au (toby) (2005-11-12)
Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question andreytarasevich@hotmail.com (Andrey Tarasevich) (2005-11-12)
Re: Cygwin 'byacc' question dickey@saltmine.radix.net (Thomas Dickey) (2005-12-19)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Bill Cox <bill@qswtools.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 8 Nov 2005 23:34:53 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-11-030
Keywords: yacc, comment

Andrey Tarasevich wrote:


> As a workaround, I can probably use a different prefix for each
> parser, instead of the default 'yy', thus eliminating the name
> conflict, but it is still strange to have the global namespace
> polluted with essentially local names. Any ideas?


The current bison version has a --name-prefix=<prefix> option,
and it's probably not much trouble to switch from byacc to bison.
I've switched grammars both ways in the past.


And the latest Linux byacc that Google shows me has a very similar
"-p <prefix>" option.
[The -p option has been available for a very long time. -John]


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.