Re: Register Based Interpreter Model

Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
2 Nov 2005 22:13:33 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Register Based Interpreter Model acampbellb@hotmail.com (Avatar) (2005-11-01)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model basile-news@starynkevitch.net (Basile Starynkevitch \[news\]) (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model nkavv@skiathos.physics.auth.gr (Uncle Noah) (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model christian.mueller@aktivanet.de (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model spammer@b2z.com (Omri Barel) (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model kurt-gmane@oakadaptive.com (Kurt Jung) (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model fw@deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) (2005-11-02)
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model lhf@csgpwr1.uwaterloo.ca (2005-11-02)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 2 Nov 2005 22:13:33 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-11-016
Keywords: VM, interpreter

* Avatar:


> I am doing some research on the register-based interpreter model in
> comparison to the more traditional stack-based approach. I would like
> to know if anyone has had any practical experience with register-based
> interpreters or has any good suggestions for references about this
> topic?


Parrot is a register-based VM. The source code probably contains
further references.


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.