Related articles |
---|
Register Based Interpreter Model acampbellb@hotmail.com (Avatar) (2005-11-01) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model basile-news@starynkevitch.net (Basile Starynkevitch \[news\]) (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model nkavv@skiathos.physics.auth.gr (Uncle Noah) (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model christian.mueller@aktivanet.de (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model spammer@b2z.com (Omri Barel) (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model kurt-gmane@oakadaptive.com (Kurt Jung) (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (2005-11-02) |
Re: Register Based Interpreter Model fw@deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer) (2005-11-02) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | "Basile Starynkevitch \[news\]" <basile-news@starynkevitch.net> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 2 Nov 2005 22:09:00 -0500 |
Organization: | http://starynkevitch.net - Ours |
References: | 05-11-016 |
Keywords: | VM, architecture |
Posted-Date: | 02 Nov 2005 22:09:00 EST |
On 2005-11-02, Avatar <acampbellb@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I am doing some research on the register-based interpreter model in
> comparison to the more traditional stack-based approach. [...]
I suggest looking into Parrot. It is a register based VM. See
http://www.parrotcode.org/
--
Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile(at)starynkevitch(dot)net
8, rue de la Faïencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.