Related articles |
---|
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-10-14) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de (Detlef Meyer-Eltz) (2005-10-15) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-10-17) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-10-19) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de (Detlef Meyer-Eltz) (2005-10-19) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-10-20) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de (Detlef Meyer-Eltz) (2005-10-23) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-10-26) |
Re: terminological problem (EBNF & regular expressions) RLake@oxfam.org.uk (2005-10-26) |
From: | Detlef Meyer-Eltz <Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 23 Oct 2005 00:32:18 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 05-10-104 05-10-125 05-10-137 |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 23 Oct 2005 00:32:18 EDT |
>>> LRgen allows one to do it like this: [X|Y|Z]/','...
> It seems like one would have to say
> ((X|Y|Z)(,(X|Y|Z))*)?
> to accomplish the same thing.
Yes, if an X or Y or Z has to follow the last comma. I could not find
the description of the '/'-operator on your web-site. So I made the
translation, which seemed to me being adequate.
For this case your syntax has won.
Regards
Detlef Meyer-Eltz
--
mailto:Meyer-Eltz@t-online.de
http://www.texttransformer.de
http://www.texttransformer.com
http://www.texttransformer.org
http://www.text-konverter.homepage.t-online.de
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.