Re: compiler for Chinese development language

Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
22 Oct 2005 23:01:29 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
[13 earlier articles]
Re: compiler for Chinese development language gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language Satyam@satyam.com.ar (Satyam) (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language henry@spsystems.net (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language henry@spsystems.net (2005-10-20)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) (2005-10-22)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2005-10-23)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language DrDiettrich@compuserve.de (Hans-Peter Diettrich) (2005-10-23)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language Robert@Knighten.org (Robert Knighten) (2005-10-26)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language nmh@t3x.org (Nils M Holm) (2005-10-26)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language owong@castortech.com (Oliver Wong) (2005-10-26)
Re: compiler for Chinese development language owong@castortech.com (Oliver Wong) (2005-10-26)
[4 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Marco van de Voort <marcov@stack.nl>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Oct 2005 23:01:29 -0400
Organization: Stack Usenet News Service
References: 05-10-085 05-10-096 05-10-107 05-10-113
Keywords: i18n
Posted-Date: 22 Oct 2005 23:01:29 EDT

On 2005-10-19, Torben Ęgidius Mogensen <torbenm@app-6.diku.dk> wrote:


> language meaning, you need to know the semantics of it in the context
> of Java scope rules. Hence, I don't really think it is much of a
> problem that keywords are in English even if you don't speak English.
> In some sens, it may be an advantage, as you are not confused by the
> broader meaning of the English word. For example, "throwing an
> exception" doesn't really make sense in everyday English.


Agree. Moreover, even if it were true, translated keywords would only help
in the first week of learning a language. And then you would have to
translate to access internet resources, general books etc etc for the rest
of your life.


( as a practical remark: At Free Pascal we typically get requests several
times a year for such versions. We don't honour them as we have enough to
do, but afaik externally two translations were made, Russian and Spanish,
both for educational purposes. Afaik both weren't kept up to date, and died
quickly (though it could still be used in schools somewhere)


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.