Related articles |
---|
[20 earlier articles] |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cleos@nb.sympatico.ca (Cleo Saulnier) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar rsc@swtch.com (Russ Cox) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar paul@parsetec.com (Paul Mann) (2005-09-22) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-09-23) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-09-25) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cfc@world.std.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-09-25) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cfc@TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-09-27) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-09-27) |
Re: Parsing Expression Grammar gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-09-30) |
[1 later articles] |
From: | "Paul Mann" <paul@parsetec.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 22 Sep 2005 23:52:29 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
Keywords: | parse |
Posted-Date: | 22 Sep 2005 23:52:29 EDT |
>> the grammar contortions that are often needed tend to be very ugly.
>> From the two LL parser generators that I wrote, this is what
>> annoyed me the most.
>
> I guess with "contortions" you mean the result of factorizing
> tokens out, to make a grammar LL(1) conform. For compiler generators with
> look ahead capabilities as ANTLR, Coco/R or the TextTransformer, this
> isn't necessary any more.
So now you have another kind of contortion, infinite look-ahead.
Replace one contortion with another for the sake of using LL? Just
proves it is flawed from the start.
Paul Mann
http://parsetec.com
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.