|byaccj vs cup vs javacc firstname.lastname@example.org (Jimmy zhang) (2005-08-21)|
|Re: byaccj vs cup vs javacc email@example.com (Scott Nicol) (2005-08-24)|
|From:||Scott Nicol <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Date:||24 Aug 2005 18:23:20 -0400|
Jimmy zhang wrote:
> Hi, I was in the process of selecting a compiler compiler
> for my project. So far there are three options for Java
> CUP, byaccj and javacc, can someone comment on the
> pros and cons of each options? I am interested in the
> maturity, adoption and ease of use, among other aspects.
You forgot ANTLR.
I'll only comment on byacc/j, since that is what I use. It is Berkeley
YACC, but it generates Java instead of C. I don't know what else to say
other than it is YACC, the parser skeleton is well-written, and it
works. If you are already using and happy with some variant of YACC,
going with yacc/j is a no-brainer.
Support is rather spotty, although a new version was released last month
fixing a few issues. There really isn't much development going on with
any YACC, so byacc/j is no different in this regard.
Return to the
Search the comp.compilers archives again.