Related articles |
---|
Copying GC and finalization der_julian@web.de (Julian Stecklina) (2005-07-26) |
Re: Copying GC and finalization cjc1@cam.ac.uk (Chris Cheney) (2005-07-28) |
Re: Copying GC and finalization liekweg@gmx.de (Florian Liekweg) (2005-07-28) |
Re: Copying GC and finalization der_julian@web.de (Julian Stecklina) (2005-08-05) |
Re: Copying GC and finalization eliotm@pacbell.net (Eliot Miranda) (2005-08-21) |
Re: Copying GC and finalization der_julian@web.de (Julian Stecklina) (2005-08-24) |
From: | Florian Liekweg <liekweg@gmx.de> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 28 Jul 2005 02:39:05 -0400 |
Organization: | University of Karlsruhe, Germany |
References: | 05-07-105 |
Keywords: | GC |
Posted-Date: | 28 Jul 2005 02:39:05 EDT |
Julian Stecklina wrote:
> I am quite puzzled on how
> to implement this without losing the nice property of copying garbage
> collectors that there is nothing to do for objects that have become
> garbage.
Well, with finalisation, you have to do *something* to those objects,
by definition.
> If anyone can point me to some information, it would be very helpful.
I remember seeing a good article on that issue by Hans-J. Boehm of HP.
Start at http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/finalization.html,
and see the POPL2003 paper "Destructors, Finalizers, and Synchronization"
by the same author.
cheers,
Florian
--
=======================================================================
Florian Liekweg | We resisted the temptation to develop what
IPD Universität Karlsruhe | the market needed at the time.
========================================[ Rich Seifert on Ethernet ]===
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.