Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia

Alex Colvin <alexc@TheWorld.com>
12 Jul 2005 05:15:21 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
[2 earlier articles]
Re: Compiler Companies in Australia walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2005-07-02)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia danwang74@gmail.com (Daniel C. Wang) (2005-07-03)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia emailamit@gmail.com (Amit Gupta) (2005-07-05)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia david.boyle@gmail.com (2005-07-05)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia walter@bytecraft.com (Walter Banks) (2005-07-05)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia der_julian@web.de (Julian Stecklina) (2005-07-11)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia alexc@TheWorld.com (Alex Colvin) (2005-07-12)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia robert.hundt@gmail.com (Robert H) (2005-07-22)
Re: GCC code quality, was Compiler Companies in Australia Robert.Thorpe@antenova.com (Robert Thorpe) (2005-07-26)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Alex Colvin <alexc@TheWorld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 12 Jul 2005 05:15:21 -0400
Organization: The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
References: 05-05-187 05-06-132 05-07-008 05-07-019 05-07-037
Keywords: architecture, GCC
Posted-Date: 12 Jul 2005 05:15:21 EDT

>> Also, last I checked the amount of hardware diveristy in the world is
>> going down. I suspect the following list covers more than 95% of all
>> shiping processors and micro-controllers. ARM, x86, PowerPC, MIPS, PIC,
>> and AVR.


>Add SPARC and HPPA and you are at ~99%...


don't forget the venerable 8051...
--
mac the naïf


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.