Related articles |
---|
[3 earlier articles] |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im qrczak@knm.org.pl (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) (2005-06-23) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-23) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-06-24) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im vtsikoza@yahoo.com (2005-06-24) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-06-24) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-24) |
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2005-06-26) |
From: | Sylvain Schmitz <schmitz@i3s.unice.fr> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 26 Jun 2005 11:18:16 -0400 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 05-06-119 05-06-121 |
Keywords: | LR(1), theory |
Posted-Date: | 26 Jun 2005 11:18:16 EDT |
SM Ryan wrote:
> More accurately, any deterministic language has an LR(1) grammar. But
> there is no algorithm to convert any LR(k), k>1, grammar to an LR(1)
> grammar.
See:
M. D. Mickunas, R. L. Lancaster and V. B. Schneider. Transforming LR(k)
Grammars to LR(1), SLR(1), and (1,1) Bounded Right-Context Grammars.
Journal of the ACM, Volume 23, Issue 3 (July 1976).
The real problems with grammar transformations like the ones presented
above are
* how to handle semantic rules properly, and
* how to avoid grammar size explosion.
The authors discuss these issues.
On the syntax level, there is also a risk of generating a different
language if one is not careful.
--
Sylvain
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.