Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler implementors)

SM Ryan <wyrmwif@tsoft.org>
22 Jun 2005 02:00:24 -0400

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler implem cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-18)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im vtsikoza@yahoo.com (2005-06-21)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-06-22)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im qrczak@knm.org.pl (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) (2005-06-23)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-23)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-06-24)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im vtsikoza@yahoo.com (2005-06-24)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-06-24)
Re: An "open" letter to Karsten Nyblad (and other compiler compiler im cfc@shell01.TheWorld.com (Chris F Clark) (2005-06-24)
[1 later articles]
| List of all articles for this month |
From: SM Ryan <wyrmwif@tsoft.org>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 22 Jun 2005 02:00:24 -0400
Organization: Quick STOP Groceries
References: 05-06-099
Keywords: parse, LR(1)
Posted-Date: 22 Jun 2005 02:00:24 EDT

# I only wonder, have not languages designers become cleverer in the
# recent decades to invent languages that do not require the full
# strength of LR(k)?


Why not just use LR(k)? Inertia? Methods to avoid the combinatorial explosion
of lookaheads have been known for years.


--
SM Ryan http://www.rawbw.com/~wyrmwif/
One of the drawbacks of being a martyr is that you have to die.

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.