Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
16 Jun 2005 00:08:07 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism tony@tonyRobinson.com (2005-06-13)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism torbenm@diku.dk (2005-06-16)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-06-16)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) (2005-06-16)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism rand@rice.edu (Randy) (2005-06-18)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-06-18)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism peteg42@gmail.com (Peter Gammie) (2005-06-19)
Re: Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-06-21)
Designing a language for dataflow/parallelism peteg42@gmail.com (Peter Gammie) (2005-06-26)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 16 Jun 2005 00:08:07 -0400
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: 05-06-081
Keywords: parallel

On 13 Jun 2005 17:57:19 -0400, tony@tonyRobinson.com wrote:


> Even perhaps a memory type that only allows one reference and
> automatically takes the prior reference out of scope, as in:


If a memory type allows only one reference, why to talk about references?
The object in that memory will be isomorphic to the reference, i.e. there
will be no difference between them. Call reference "object" and forget
about pointers.


--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.