Related articles |
---|
Practical LALR(1) grammer? weltraum@astrocat.de (2005-06-12) |
Practical LALR(1) grammar? news4e71@yahoo.com (0x4e71) (2005-06-13) |
Re: Practical LALR(1) grammer? haberg@math.su.se (2005-06-13) |
Re: Practical LALR(1) grammer? haberg@math.su.se (2005-06-13) |
Re: Practical LALR(1) grammer? bluemalov@hotmail.com (Andrew Wilson) (2005-06-13) |
Re: Practical LALR(1) grammer? d148f3wg02@sneakemail.com (Karsten Nyblad) (2005-06-16) |
Re: Practical LALR(1) grammer? haberg@math.su.se (2005-06-18) |
[2 later articles] |
From: | weltraum@astrocat.de |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 12 Jun 2005 21:35:02 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Keywords: | LALR, parse, question |
Posted-Date: | 12 Jun 2005 21:35:02 EDT |
hi,
I don't understand the "magic" of LALR(1) yet (in contrast to SLR(1) ),
and would be happy if someone could give me some practical LALR(1)
grammar snippets, which one could recognize as part of some (existing)
language. The symbols should have meaningful names, because grammars
which contain letters only are not useful in this case.
thanks
Chris
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.