Related articles |
---|
Interprocedural SSA form? devriese@cs.tcd.ie (Edsko de Vries) (2005-06-02) |
Re: Interprocedural SSA form? jsinger@cs.man.ac.uk (Jeremy Singer) (2005-06-02) |
Re: Interprocedural SSA form? liekweg@ipd.info.uni-karlsruhe.de (Florian Liekweg) (2005-06-02) |
Re: Interprocedural SSA form? find@my.address.elsewhere (Matthias Blume) (2005-06-04) |
Re: Interprocedural SSA form? jsinger@cs.man.ac.uk (Jeremy Singer) (2005-06-04) |
From: | "Edsko de Vries" <devriese@cs.tcd.ie> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 2 Jun 2005 01:06:34 -0400 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Keywords: | analysis, question |
Posted-Date: | 02 Jun 2005 01:06:33 EDT |
Hi,
When writing a compiler based around SSA, is every procedure converted
to SSA form individually, or is it possible to create some sort of
"super control flow graph" that incorporates procedures, and convert
the entire thing to SSA form? Is there benefits/downsides to either
approach? Is there some literature I can read on this topic?
Thanks,
Edsko
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.