Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Re: C++ intermediate representation. mefrill@yandex.ru (2005-05-15) |
| RE: C++ intermediate representation. quinn-j@shaw.ca (Quinn Tyler Jackson) (2005-05-15) |
| RE: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. rabbit@thehole.com (Tom) (2005-05-16) |
| RE: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-16) |
| Re: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-05-18) |
| Re: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-18) |
| Re: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-05-19) |
| Re: Language Design Principles, was C++ intermediate representation. rweaver@ix.netcom.com (Dick Weaver) (2005-05-19) |
| From: | "Rodney M. Bates" <rbates@southwind.net> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 19 May 2005 21:41:16 -0400 |
| Organization: | EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net |
| References: | 05-05-114 05-05-130 05-05-132 05-05-143 05-05-164 |
| Keywords: | history |
| Posted-Date: | 19 May 2005 21:41:16 EDT |
Rodney M. Bates wrote:
> It also my experience that those who do have a complete understanding
> of a confused language usually develop it only after extensive past
> experience with a more simply-designed language.
And our moderator responded:
> [I dunno. My first language was Fortran, on punch cards, and it doesn't
> seem to have damaged my comprehension too badly. -John]
That was my first one too, but I attribute most of my comprehension to
languages after Fortran, but still learned in the past.
[Well, my second language was Trac. That doubtless warped me for
life. But its syntax sure is consistent. -John]
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.