Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer

Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (Trevor Jenkins)
7 May 2005 17:01:32 -0400

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
ALGOL - lexical analyzer edimodric@makni.inet.hr (Eddie) (2005-05-05)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-06)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer henry@spsystems.net (2005-05-07)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-07)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (2005-05-07)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer haberg@math.su.se (2005-05-07)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-05-08)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-05-08)
Re: ALGOL - lexical analyzer gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-05-08)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: Trevor.Jenkins@suneidesis.com (Trevor Jenkins)
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 7 May 2005 17:01:32 -0400
Organization: suneidesis
References: 05-05-027 05-05-029
Keywords: algol68

On 6 May 2005 23:08:36 -0400, John Levine commented:


> ... I can't lay my hands on my Algol68 report but as I recall
> they avoided that mistake and defined it in a single ASCII-ish
> character set.


The Revised Report is available online at various sites, for example
http://vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de/~wb/RR/rrTOC.html


Issue 40 of The Algol Bulletin had an article with the "Report on the
Standard Hardware Representation for ALGOL 68" by Wilfred J Hansen and
Hendrik Boom. An archive of the Algol Bulletin can be found at
http://www.softeng.ox.ac.uk/Jeremy.Gibbons/wg21/algol-bulletin/INDEX.HTM
The scanned version of the representation report causes havoc with my web
browers (including latest Firefox) YMMV.


Regards, Trevor


<>< Re: deemed!


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.