Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.
| Related articles |
|---|
| Writing Compilers in Functional Languages onlyafly@gmail.com (Kkaa) (2005-04-26) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages stephen@dino.dnsalias.com (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages cm.abo@aktivanet.de (Christian Mueller) (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages torbenm@diku.dk (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages arthurvl+news@cs.uu.nl (Arthur van Leeuwen) (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages tarvydas@allstream.net (Paul Tarvydas) (2005-04-28) |
| Re: Writing Compilers in Functional Languages neelk@cs.cmu.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami) (2005-04-28) |
| [6 later articles] |
| From: | Robert A Duff <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> |
| Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
| Date: | 28 Apr 2005 14:29:26 -0400 |
| Organization: | The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA |
| References: | 05-04-068 |
| Keywords: | functional |
| Posted-Date: | 28 Apr 2005 14:29:26 EDT |
"Kkaa" <onlyafly@gmail.com> writes:
> I've written a few compilers and interpreters in procedural and
> object-oriented languages (in particular Java, C, C++, and C#), and
> these seem to be popular choices, but I would like to write my next
> one in a functional language. Every compiler text I've read assumes
> that you are writing your compiler in a procedural or OO language.
> Are there any books or online resources that instead focus on using
> functional languages as implementation languages? I'm considering
> using Haskell or Scheme, but I'm hoping that the resources won't
> assume a particular functional langauge.
Andrew Appel wrote a compiler book that uses ML as the example
implementation language:
http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~appel/modern/ml/
- Bob
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.