Re: Examples of LR(k) grammars (k > 1) sought

Sylvain Schmitz <schmitz@i3s.unice.fr>
31 Mar 2005 23:32:46 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Examples of LR(k) grammars (k > 1) sought zlaski@ziemas.net (Ziemowit Laski) (2005-03-27)
Re: Examples of LR(k) grammars (k > 1) sought nospam@nospam.nospam (Karsten Nyblad) (2005-03-31)
Re: Examples of LR(k) grammars (k > 1) sought schmitz@i3s.unice.fr (Sylvain Schmitz) (2005-03-31)
Re: Examples of LR(k) grammars (k > 1) sought zlaski@ziemas.net (Ziemowit Laski) (2005-03-31)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: Sylvain Schmitz <schmitz@i3s.unice.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 31 Mar 2005 23:32:46 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-03-115
Keywords: LR(1), parse
Posted-Date: 31 Mar 2005 23:32:46 EST

Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone could point me to actual examples of
> grammars that are LR(k) but _not_ LALR(k), for k > 1, and/or to an
> algorithm for generating such grammars.


The usual example of an LR(1) grammar which is not LALR is:


S -> aAa | bAb | aBb | bBa
A -> c
B -> c


The LR(0) state reached when reading "ac" or "bc" allows both the
reductions of "c" to "A" and to "B". The lookahead possible for each
reduction contains "a" and "b", for the LR(0) state merge has lost the
information of which token---"a" or "b"---has been read first.
Increasing the value of k will not change anything.


If you also need your grammar to be non-LR(1), just put the end context
further as in:
S -> aADa | bADb | aBDb | bBDa
A -> c
B -> c
D -> d^{k-1}


If you were looking for more real life examples, I remember there is one
in the bison manual [http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/manual], which
you can probably adapt in order to have k > 1.


--
Hope that helps,


      Sylvain



Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.