Related articles |
---|
type checking SQL expressions jean.morissette666@videotron.ca (Jean Morissette) (2005-03-20) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-03-24) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca (2005-03-25) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions gene@abhost.us (Gene Wirchenko) (2005-03-27) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca (Brian Inglis) (2005-03-31) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions jean.morissette666@videotron.ca (Jean Morissette) (2005-04-11) |
Re: type checking SQL expressions gneuner2@comcast.net (George Neuner) (2005-04-16) |
From: | Gene Wirchenko <gene@abhost.us> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 27 Mar 2005 12:56:16 -0500 |
Organization: | Compilers Central |
References: | 05-03-076 05-03-100 |
Keywords: | SQL, types |
Posted-Date: | 27 Mar 2005 12:56:16 EST |
Brian.Inglis@SystematicSW.ab.ca wrote:
[snip]
>SQL has been standardized by ANSI, but I don't know how much of the
>type information has been standardized; a lot of types are product
>specific; I've found numeric, char, varchar to be most generic,
>allowing definitions to be used with different products; try asking in
>alt.comp.databases where Joe Celko often responds.
I did not see any recent posts from him there. comp.databases
and comp.databases.theory, which I follow, might be better choices.
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.