Re: Q1. reducing grammar redundancy

"valentin tihomirov" <spam@abelectron.com>
28 Feb 2005 19:49:41 -0500

          From comp.compilers
Related articles
Q1. reducing grammar redundancy spam@abelectron.com (valentin tihomirov) (2005-02-20)
Re: Q1. reducing grammar redundancy wyrmwif@tsoft.org (SM Ryan) (2005-02-28)
Re: Q1. reducing grammar redundancy vidar@hokstad.name (Vidar Hokstad) (2005-02-28)
Re: Q1. reducing grammar redundancy branco.medeiros@gmail.com (2005-02-28)
Re: Q1. reducing grammar redundancy spam@abelectron.com (valentin tihomirov) (2005-02-28)
| List of all articles for this month |
From: "valentin tihomirov" <spam@abelectron.com>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Feb 2005 19:49:41 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-02-086 05-02-092
Keywords: lex, design
Posted-Date: 28 Feb 2005 19:49:41 EST

> But the big question is why you want to write this in a more compact
> way?


I just dislike redundancy in design. IMO, the whole story about
programming is automation sepecially when speaking about compiler
compilers. As one famous hacker put it: "I'd rather write programs
that write programs than write programs." :o)


Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.