Re: Compiler 101

"" <>
28 Feb 2005 00:50:02 -0500

          From comp.compilers

Related articles
Compiler 101 (Jon Masterson) (2005-01-22)
Re: Compiler 101 (2005-01-24)
Re: Compiler 101 (Laurence Finston) (2005-01-24)
Re: Compiler 101 (Jon Masterson) (2005-01-24)
Re: Compiler 101 (Jon Masterson) (2005-01-30)
Re: Compiler 101 (Nobodyzhome) (2005-01-30)
Re: Compiler 101 (2005-02-18)
Re: Compiler 101 ( (2005-02-28)
| List of all articles for this month |

From: "" <>
Newsgroups: comp.compilers
Date: 28 Feb 2005 00:50:02 -0500
Organization: Compilers Central
References: 05-01-067 05-01-086
Keywords: interpreter
Posted-Date: 28 Feb 2005 00:50:02 EST

Jon Masterson wrote:
>>Hi All
>>[Our usual advice is first to look at existing scripting languages
>>such as python, Ruby, Lua, and TCL. There's rarely a compelling
>>reason that you need to invent yet another scripting language, and
>>it's a whole lot easier to hook your application to one that already
>>works. -John]

> Thanks for the advice but the simulator program that I need to control
> has very specific requirements and using any sort of pre-existing
> language would not be much help - I do not know of any that can
> describe a cloud layer or the state of an aircraft cockpit instruments
> in a single statement

Not sure if embedded C/C++ interpreter ch will help? you can check more at

> Jon
> [I don't see why not. Most of them have some sort of structure you can
> use. -John]

Post a followup to this message

Return to the comp.compilers page.
Search the comp.compilers archives again.