Related articles |
---|
The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-11) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-02-12) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages sgganesh@gmail.com (Ganny) (2005-02-12) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com (Robert A Duff) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages cartazio@gmail.com (Carter Schonwald) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages dot@dotat.at (Tony Finch) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages gah@ugcs.caltech.edu (glen herrmannsfeldt) (2005-02-13) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages nmm1@cus.cam.ac.uk (2005-02-16) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages boldyrev@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2005-02-16) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages boldyrev+nospam@cgitftp.uiggm.nsc.ru (Ivan Boldyrev) (2005-02-16) |
Re: The compilation approach in modern languages rbates@southwind.net (Rodney M. Bates) (2005-02-16) |
[12 later articles] |
From: | "Carter Schonwald" <cartazio@gmail.com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.compilers |
Date: | 13 Feb 2005 22:46:08 -0500 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
References: | 05-02-05305-02-056 |
Keywords: | functional, code |
Posted-Date: | 13 Feb 2005 22:46:08 EST |
I'm not aware of any general characteristic of functional languages
that precludes batch compilation, especially since such compilers are
not unusual.
The runtime creation of a function merely requires something along the
lines of packing together a pointer to the beginning of the function's
body and a pointer to the current variable environment into a tuple.
If you meant something else, could you please clarify?
Return to the
comp.compilers page.
Search the
comp.compilers archives again.